-Criteria-

     We are evaluating our alternatives based on how much income is being brought in, the ease of implementation, and whether or not they are desirable.

Student Desirability

     Here we are measuring students' reactions to each of the following alternatives.  That is we want to know if students overall would like to see any of the following alternatives implemented in WSU. This is important because two of the three alternatives require students to sacrifice a bit of cash to help increase funding.

Ease of Implementation

     The alternatives require tasks/bylaws in which committees must follow in order to receive the funding correctly without risk of wasting any amount. Here we are measuring the time and management effectiveness of each alternative. That is, we want to know which of the following alternatives requires less effort to manage in a timely way.

Income

     Each of the alternatives will generate different income based on their function. Here, we measure how much could potentially be brought in per year. This allows us make comparisons in order to find out which of the following alternatives produce the biggest income. which is a benefit

What needs to be worked on:

The desirability criteria could use some more clarity. We are confused whether the pass or fail survey was the best, and just about what and who are making the sacrifices.